WordWolf

Get out! The AUDITORIUM has SHOWERS in it now? (Or always did and they were hidden when I was there, either-or.) What COULD they have been used for? The mind boggles!

Actually, IIRC, it was an allergy to "bromelain." Every time I see the name appear somewhere, I flash back to Dr Phlox mentioning it. I liked him mentioning how they couldn't just "scan his tastebuds to find out what he likes" because "medically speaking, there's no accounting for taste." Okay, the next episode, let's see...

Since this quote has no responses, I'm suspicious the quote and movie are not that well-known. If no one can get this one, can we move on?

http://easydamus.com/alignmenthpc.html Actually, Harry Potter, as a Neutral Good, would find Chaotic Neutrals to be loose cannons, and unpredicable as allies-if they were ever on his side. They would have avoided the "unnecessary" effort of joining the DA (Defense Association/Dumbledore's Army) and practicing defense for all those months outside of class. They also would have avoided the battle at the Ministry of Magic, because it didn't immediately affect THEM. Chaotic Neutrals are not "big picture" or "long-term" types- "What's in it for me?" is a typical sentence from one. On the other hand, he's been rather clear on this thread that he considers words like "good" and "evil" to be meaningless in anything except a philosophical discussion, that they don't exist in and of themselves. "There is no good or evil: only power and those too weak to seek it."- Book One, HPatSS/HPatPS. So, the imaginary character Harry Potter may not be proud of Bolshevik, but the imaginary character Lord Voldemort would certainly appreciate his sentiments. (This would concern some people, the people MOST concerned would be the ones who worry about what imaginary characters think of them.)

That's a lot like saying that the Police and the Fire Dept never saved YOUR life, so they accomplish "absolutely nothing." A lot of people's lives WERE changed for the better BY people in twi who meant to do good. If twi had actually been designed to DO good, it would have been a lot more effective for those people, but that in no way invalidates the good that WAS done. A number of people have honestly said that if it wasn't for someone in twi who cared and reached out to them, they would have undoubtedly have DIED. I don't question you for saying that people in twi screwed you over unmercifully, and I don't question them for saying that people in twi rescued them. It would have been nice if twi people had never traumatized you, or if some of them had rescued you FROM twi, but that doesn't mean the ones who did good did "nothing." A lot of people died 9/11 when the buildings fell. A lot of people survived 9/11 when they got out of the buildings, and some of those got out solely because emergency responders GOT them out fast- Police, Fire, EMS. To point to the dead and say "the emergency responders did nothing" would be considered highly foolish.

http://easydamus.com/alignment.html

If you'd taken a moment and followed the link, you would have seen an answer in less time than it took to post the question. "Animals and other creatures incapable of moral action are neutral rather than good or evil. Even deadly vipers and tigers that eat people are neutral because they lack the capacity for morally right or wrong behavior." That may not be a PERFECT answer, but it is a decent working definition and is not only clear but concise and to the point. No. The fellow who posted the website had no "ulterior motives or concerns." Preteens playing RPGs can grasp this system fairly well and apply it. It's just adults who are "too smart" to manage it. Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Hebrews 5:14 But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil. Ecclesiastes 12:14 For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.

Let me get back to you in a few days. I don't have time to give this the attention it warrants right now.

I agree. All this sophistry and dancing around just to avoid saying someone did a "good deed." Heck, any Boy Scout in the USA should be able to give you examples of a "good deed" or of "doing a good deed every day." Perhaps it's all because the person who's so reluctant to call an action "good" is covering a reluctance to do good to others, or to face one's one moral standing. Being able to explain "good" vs "evil" really isn't that hard for a lot of people, even without bringing in any religion into the explanation. http://easydamus.com/alignment.html "Good characters and creatures protect innocent life. Evil characters and creatures debase or destroy innocent life, whether for fun or profit. "Good" implies altruism, respect for life, and a concern for the dignity of sentient beings. Good characters make personal sacrifices to help others. "Evil" implies hurting, oppressing, and killing others. Some evil creatures simply have no compassion for others and kill without qualms if doing so is convenient. Others actively pursue evil, killing for sport or out of duty to some evil deity or master. " ============= For those who are curious where their own personality might rank on good-evil, law-chaos axes, they can take this "alignment" quiz: http://easydamus.com/alignmenttest.html For those who are curious where their own personality would fall among D&D characters, they can try this character quiz: http://easydamus.com/character.html

When I was in, it was obvious to everyone I knew that we were no longer under The Law, we were under Grace. As such, the worst I would have done to someone who did not break the laws of the land would be to avoid them, and if they broke the law the worst I'd do is notify local law enforcement.

Of course, they never actually READ THE PASSAGE that said so..... This had nothing to do with MINORS- this was about ADULT offspring ("children"): Deuteronomy 21:18-21 (KJV) 18If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them: 19Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place; 20And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard. 21And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and all Israel shall hear, and fear. Deuteronomy 21:18-21 (NASB) 18"If any man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey his father or his mother, and when they chastise him, he will not even listen to them, 19then his father and mother shall seize him, and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gateway of his hometown. 20"They shall say to the elders of his city, 'This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey us, he is a glutton and a drunkard.' 21"Then all the men of his city shall stone him to death; so you shall remove the evil from your midst, and all Israel will hear of it and fear.

Correct! Your turn.

Previous discussions....

When I took it, it was recommended we don't take notes, but that was not mandatory. The idea was that whoever thought that rule up was incapable of focusing on a class while taking notes. Some of us, however, were excellent at doing that- and retained material BETTER if we took notes. At the end of the first segment, someone recommended I take my notes directly into the syllabus rather than in a separate book. This made sense- I was juggling a syllabus, Bible and a notebook. Taking notes into the syllabus meant I could put down the notebook. Writing down questions was something else-I didn't have any of those written down.

"a new element for an electric kettle like this (picture of electric kettle) would cost as much as the entire gross national product of the United States of America from 1770 to the year 2000, and even then they wouldn't be able to afford the small fixing ring which attaches it to the kettle." "The official result of the World Hide-and-Seek, Mr Don Roberrs from Hinckley, Leicestershire, 11 years, 2 months, 26 days, 9 hours, 3 minutes, 27 seconds. Mr Francisco Huron, Paraguay, 11 years, a months, 26 days, 9 hours, 3 minutes, 27 seconds. The result - a tie." "A tie! Well what a fantastic result. Well the replay will start tomorrow at 7.30 a.m."

So was I. Bolshevik's experience of twi was different from ours. vpw intentionally targeted the young of the counter-culture movement, partly because they were young and naive, partly because of their exposure to free sex. By marketing his stuff as counter-culture, he appealed to their anti-establishment bent. Doesn't mean every kid twi appealed to at the time joined for that reason, or that everyone joined as kids or for those reasons even if they WERE kids. I'm pretty confident vpw would have preferred never to have seen people like me join up. Smart enough to connect the dots if I can see the dots, unable to be bought off, and good enough at Bible recitation to climb the ladder to where I'd be able to see and connect the dots, that's a formula for vpw's cadre being exposed. But he was already dead when I'd first heard of him, so he had little say about me joining. And I wasn't high enough up the ladder for lcm to have heard of me when he drew his line in the sand in '89, which was error-ridden enough to induce me to leave. Ironically, if I'd stayed, I would have been a lot higher up the ladder all of a sudden- since 80% or more of the people higher up the ladder than me had all walked off in disgust.

[offtopic] Steve, it's not a "hair lip", it's called a "harelip". http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-harelip.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleft_lip_and_palate [/offtopic]

This is "the Brady Bunch." The exchange is what I remember. Greg worked for Sam the Butcher for the Summer or something. Then he and Bobby got locked in the meat-locker. (It's incredibly dangerous to have a room that won't unseal from the inside without a key. A super I once knew called an APARTMENT like that "a deathtrap" in casual conversation, and told the guy who lived there to replace it with a slam-lock or something instead of needing the key from inside, and said if something happened, he would die. He was pretty serious. But, it happens in sitcoms and is all fixed by the end of the episode.) The meat-locker had a small window, and Greg was able to smash it and hoist Bobby to it. Bobby, the smallest, worked his way out of the window. Then he tried to use the payphone to call Sam to show up with the key. But he didn't have a dime for the phone. Greg threw him one. Which Bobby stopped and commented about instead of just dialing. (The line about the awfully cold dime comes back to me clearly- which brings back dimmer memories of the rest of the scene, and I can reconstruct more from that.) We were talking about TV clown Bozo. One of the kids (Bobby, I think, but it could have been Peter) tried to win a contest on TV eating ice cream. Without his hands. On one of those kids-with-a-costumed-clown shows, except this guy was some sort of king.

Wasn't that about "the new birth", and not about general labors?

I know this is an "Enterprise" episode, and that's probably as far as I'll get. I remember the "pineapple cake" subplot.

Yes, it's "Justice." I think one obvious question is "how thorough is your briefing of the laws of the society, if you didn't know there was ONE penalty for law-breaking, and it could be dispensed for littering or jaywalking if it was done in a randomly-determined place?"

One the one hand, she didn't seem to mind enjoying the royal treatment she got, that vpw demanded they both get. She's been heard being rather bossy at times with jobs that had to be redone that were technically fine, but didn't look the way she pictured, so Way Builders had to pull out good work and start over. Her appearance at his side lent slick vic a legitimacy beyond his con. On the other hand, would any of us want to have traded places with her? Despite the creature comforts, she lived under vpw's thumb and at his sufferance. The man had a violent temper, chose to rage at will, was frequently drunk, and saw all other humans in relation to what they did for him, and not people in their own rights, due their own dignity. I have little doubt she lived in fear of him for much of her life. (Or "negative believing" for those of you who haven't freed yourself of compulsive wayspeak.)

Time for the next movie. "Springtime for Hitler and Germany. Winter for Poland and France."

It varies between languages, presumably to a common, pithy saying easily recognized by the audience. According to the IMDb page, http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081505/trivia "The book that Jack was writing contained the one sentence ("All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy") repeated over and over. Stanley Kubrick had each page individually typed. For the Italian version of the film, Kubrick used the phrase "Il mattino ha l' oro in bocca" ("He who wakes up early meets a golden day"). For the German version, it was "Was Du heute kannst besorgen, das verschiebe nicht auf Morgen" ("Never put off till tomorrow what you can do today"). For the Spanish version, it was "No por mucho madrugar amanece más temprano" ("Rising early will not make dawn sooner."). For the French version, it was "Un 'Tiens' vaut mieux que deux 'Tu l'auras'" ("A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush"). "

Ok, in the interest of moving things along, I'll suppose there was some sort of confirmation for the correct episode in there somewhere, and post the next clue. =============================== "I've listed my report on their customs and laws, sir. Fairly simple, common sense things." "But even the happiest report has its negatives. Let's start with them." "There are none, sir. Not that any of us can find."