Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Learned Helplessness


Belle
 Share

Recommended Posts

Another tactic TWI expertly applied to get us to ignore those "gut feelings" and red flags waving in our face. I think back on how the longer I was involved in TWI, the less capable I felt of making my own decisions. It's because we weren't allowed to and when we did, we were second guessed or shot down.

They treated us like we were stupid. When I started asking questions about TWI doctrine and practice, even before I found WayDale or GSpot, they accused me of going online because, "I couldn't have possibly thought of that on my own." :realmad: How stupid do they think we are??

Here's how they did it:

Based on an adaptation of work from Alice Miller's For Your Own Good and John Bradshaw's Healing the Shame That Binds You

Authority figures (AF) can be parents, partners, teachers, principals, supervisors, religious figureheads, cult leaders, etc. Dependents can be children, partners, students, employees, religious followers, etc. What matters is that there is a power imbalance and a dependence of some sort, whether physical, financial, "spiritual," psychological or emotional.

1. AF's are the masters of dependents.

2. AF's alone decide what is right and wrong.

3. They alone make up the definitions, the rules, and the "consequences" (i.e. punishment)

4. Dependents are held responsible for the AF's feelings (anger, disappointment, embarrassment, humiliation, happiness and unhappiness)

5. The AF is only responsible and accountable for good things that happen, never the bad ones. Thus the AF' appears to always be in the right and when things go wrong, the dependent is always blamed and feels responsible and guilty.

6. The AF tries to exercise total control of the dependent by controlling his thoughts, feelings and behavior. Whenever this control is not absolute, the AF feels threatened.

7. The dependent's individuality is minimized as much as possible by the AF.

8. The AF creates an intricate system of punishments and rewards which rob the dependent of any sense of inner direction and esteem.

9. The following freedoms listed by Virginia Satire are denied to the dependent as much as possible:

The freedom to perceive

To think and interpret

To feel

To want, need, and chose

10. The AF never (or rarely) admits mistakes or apologizes.

11. All of the above take place in a way which does not expose the AF's true motives and none of this is openly talked about. No "back talk" is allowed

Some of the Consequences

* Mistakes are concealed

* People are under constant stress

* Needs are frustrated, denied

* Fear dominates

* Power is based on fear, not respect

* Information is withheld and distorted

* Information flow is primarily from top down

* Behavior is forced; does not come naturally

* Behavior is not consistent with true feelings, which adds to the stress

* Conflicts and problems are blamed on the dependent's "poor attitudes" and "character flaws."

All of this tears the dependent person apart, causing self-alienation and even self-loathing. The dependent person loses faith in his/her own mind and feelings with devastating self-esteem consequences. Depression, rage, mood swings, co-dependency, self-injury and self-destruction are typical outcomes. If the authority figure is a parent the person will likely develop symptoms of various "disorders" such as the so-called Borderline Personality disorder, Social Anxiety Disorder, Anoexia, Bulemia etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank You Dear Belle,

This helps me understand lots of things far more clearly; Both about myself and others! I will be forever reading I think.

:offtopic: Belle, I surely do appreciate the efforts and lengths that you go to here at GSC.to help and provide essential information in such a complete way! Thanks!

I Love You((((((((((((((((( Belle))))))))))))))), RG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, y'all. I didn't write it, but it sure struck a nerve when I read it. TWI leadership were masters at manipulation and the results have been devastating to so many of us. Here's more that may sound familiar:

Emotional abuse victims can become so convinced that they are worthless that they believe that no one else could want them. They stay in abusive situations because they believe they have nowhere else to go. Their ultimate fear is being all alone.

Types of Emotional Abuse

Abusive Expectations

* The other person places unreasonable demands on you and wants you to put everything else aside to tend to their needs.

* It could be a demand for constant attention, or a requirement that you spend all your free time with the person.

* But no matter how much you give, it's never enough.

* You are subjected to constant criticism, and you are constantly berated because you don't fulfill all this person's needs.

Aggressing

* Aggressive forms of abuse include name-calling, accusing, blaming, threatening, and ordering. Aggressing behaviors are generally direct and obvious. The one-up position the abuser assumes by attempting to judge or invalidate the recipient undermines the equality and autonomy that are essential to healthy adult relationships. This parent-child pattern of communication (which is common to all forms of verbal abuse) is most obvious when the abuser takes an aggressive stance.

* Aggressive abuse can also take a more indirect form and may even be disguised and "helping." Criticizing, advising, offering solutions, analyzing, proving, and questioning another person may be a sincere attempt to help. In some instances however, these behaviors may be an attempt to belittle, control, or demean rather than help. The underlying judgmental "I know best" tone the abuser takes in these situations is inappropriate and creates unequal footing in peer relationships. This and other types of emotional abuse can lead to what is known as learned helplessness.

Denying

* Denying a person's emotional needs, especially when they feel that need the most, and done with the intent of hurting, punishing or humiliating (Examples)

* The other person may deny that certain events occurred or that certain things were said. confronts the abuser about an incident of name calling, the abuser may insist, "I never said that," "I don't know what you're talking about," etc. You know differently.

* The other person may deny your perceptions, memory and very sanity.

* Withholding is another form of denying. Withholding includes refusing to listen, refusing to communicate, and emotionally withdrawing as punishment. This is sometimes called the "silent treatment."

* When the abuser disallows and overrules any viewpoints, perceptions or feelings which differ from their own.

* Denying can be particularly damaging. In addition to lowering self-esteem and creating conflict, the invalidation of reality, feelings, and experiences can eventually lead you to question and mistrust your own perceptions and emotional experience.

* Denying and other forms of emotional abuse can cause you to lose confidence in your most valuable survival tool: your own mind.

Dominating

* Someone wants to control your every action. They have to have their own way, and will resort to threats to get it.

* When you allow someone else to dominate you, you can lose respect for yourself.

Emotional Blackmail

* The other person plays on your fear, guilt, compassion, values, or other "hot buttons" to get what they want.

* This could include threats to end the relationship, totally reject or abandon you, giving you the the "cold shoulder," or using other fear tactics to control you.

Invalidation

* The abuser seeks to distort or undermine the recipient's perceptions of their world. Invalidating occurs when the abuser refuses or fails to acknowledge reality. For example, if the recipient tells the person they felt hurt by something the abuser did or said, the abuser might say "You are too sensitive. That shouldn't hurt you." Here is a much more complete description of invalidation

Minimizing

* Minimizing is a less extreme form of denial. When minimizing, the abuser may not deny that a particular event occurred, but they question the recipient's emotional experience or reaction to an event. Statements such as "You're too sensitive," "You're exaggerating," or "You're blowing this out of proportion" all suggest that the recipient's emotions and perceptions are faulty and not be trusted.

* Trivializing, which occurs when the abuser suggests that what you have done or communicated is inconsequential or unimportant, is a more subtle form of minimizing.

Unpredictable Responses

* Drastic mood changes or sudden emotional outbursts. Whenever someone in your life reacts very differently at different times to the same behavior from you, tells you one thing one day and the opposite the next, or likes something you do one day and hates it the next, you are being abused with unpredictable responses.

* This behavior is damaging because it puts you always on edge. You're always waiting for the other shoe to drop, and you can never know what's expected of you. You must remain hypervigilant, waiting for the other person's next outburst or change of mood.

* An alcoholic or drug abuser is likely to act this way. Living with someone like this is tremendously demanding and anxiety provoking, causing the abused person to feel constantly frightened, unsettled and off balance.

Verbal Assaults

* Berating, belittling, criticizing, name calling, screaming, threatening

* Excessive blaming, and using sarcasm and humiliation.

* Blowing your flaws out of proportion and making fun of you in front of others. Over time, this type of abuse erodes your sense of self confidence and self-worth.

SOME of us were abused in this manner..... in the 90's it was most of us. THIS is why, like Eyes mentioned in her 1986 Lead thread, we didn't speak up even when we knew deep down we were right. This is why, even now, so many of us struggle with guilt for not being good enough, for being kicked out, for leaving even when we knew it was right. THIS is why, even now, so many people go to great leaps of logic to justify the behavior of TWI leadership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on Geo. Explain.

I'll save some time.

He's referring to the "militant atheist" position that all religious belief is grounded in delusion and

deception, whether self-deception or deception of other, and that society would be

better served by eliminating all religion.

It's different from what we were discussing on the rest of the thread,

but you did ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To continue, Belle said:

Thanks, y'all. I didn't write it, but it sure struck a nerve when I read it. TWI leadership were masters at manipulation and the results have been devastating to so many of us. Here's more that may sound familiar:

Emotional abuse victims can become so convinced that they are worthless that they believe that no one else could want them. They stay in abusive situations because they believe they have nowhere else to go. Their ultimate fear is being all alone.

Types of Emotional Abuse

Abusive Expectations

* The other person places unreasonable demands on you and wants you to put everything else aside to tend to their needs.

* It could be a demand for constant attention, or a requirement that you spend all your free time with the person.

* But no matter how much you give, it's never enough.

* You are subjected to constant criticism, and you are constantly berated because you don't fulfill all this person's needs.

Aggressing

* Aggressive forms of abuse include name-calling, accusing, blaming, threatening, and ordering. Aggressing behaviors are generally direct and obvious. The one-up position the abuser assumes by attempting to judge or invalidate the recipient undermines the equality and autonomy that are essential to healthy adult relationships. This parent-child pattern of communication (which is common to all forms of verbal abuse) is most obvious when the abuser takes an aggressive stance.

* Aggressive abuse can also take a more indirect form and may even be disguised and "helping." Criticizing, advising, offering solutions, analyzing, proving, and questioning another person may be a sincere attempt to help. In some instances however, these behaviors may be an attempt to belittle, control, or demean rather than help. The underlying judgmental "I know best" tone the abuser takes in these situations is inappropriate and creates unequal footing in peer relationships. This and other types of emotional abuse can lead to what is known as learned helplessness.

Denying

* Denying a person's emotional needs, especially when they feel that need the most, and done with the intent of hurting, punishing or humiliating (Examples)

* The other person may deny that certain events occurred or that certain things were said. confronts the abuser about an incident of name calling, the abuser may insist, "I never said that," "I don't know what you're talking about," etc. You know differently.

* The other person may deny your perceptions, memory and very sanity.

* Withholding is another form of denying. Withholding includes refusing to listen, refusing to communicate, and emotionally withdrawing as punishment. This is sometimes called the "silent treatment."

* When the abuser disallows and overrules any viewpoints, perceptions or feelings which differ from their own.

* Denying can be particularly damaging. In addition to lowering self-esteem and creating conflict, the invalidation of reality, feelings, and experiences can eventually lead you to question and mistrust your own perceptions and emotional experience.

* Denying and other forms of emotional abuse can cause you to lose confidence in your most valuable survival tool: your own mind.

Dominating

* Someone wants to control your every action. They have to have their own way, and will resort to threats to get it.

* When you allow someone else to dominate you, you can lose respect for yourself.

Emotional Blackmail

* The other person plays on your fear, guilt, compassion, values, or other "hot buttons" to get what they want.

* This could include threats to end the relationship, totally reject or abandon you, giving you the the "cold shoulder," or using other fear tactics to control you.

Invalidation

* The abuser seeks to distort or undermine the recipient's perceptions of their world. Invalidating occurs when the abuser refuses or fails to acknowledge reality. For example, if the recipient tells the person they felt hurt by something the abuser did or said, the abuser might say "You are too sensitive. That shouldn't hurt you." Here is a much more complete description of invalidation

Minimizing

* Minimizing is a less extreme form of denial. When minimizing, the abuser may not deny that a particular event occurred, but they question the recipient's emotional experience or reaction to an event. Statements such as "You're too sensitive," "You're exaggerating," or "You're blowing this out of proportion" all suggest that the recipient's emotions and perceptions are faulty and not be trusted.

* Trivializing, which occurs when the abuser suggests that what you have done or communicated is inconsequential or unimportant, is a more subtle form of minimizing.

Unpredictable Responses

* Drastic mood changes or sudden emotional outbursts. Whenever someone in your life reacts very differently at different times to the same behavior from you, tells you one thing one day and the opposite the next, or likes something you do one day and hates it the next, you are being abused with unpredictable responses.

* This behavior is damaging because it puts you always on edge. You're always waiting for the other shoe to drop, and you can never know what's expected of you. You must remain hypervigilant, waiting for the other person's next outburst or change of mood.

* An alcoholic or drug abuser is likely to act this way. Living with someone like this is tremendously demanding and anxiety provoking, causing the abused person to feel constantly frightened, unsettled and off balance.

Verbal Assaults

* Berating, belittling, criticizing, name calling, screaming, threatening

* Excessive blaming, and using sarcasm and humiliation.

* Blowing your flaws out of proportion and making fun of you in front of others. Over time, this type of abuse erodes your sense of self confidence and self-worth.

SOME of us were abused in this manner..... in the 90's it was most of us. THIS is why, like Eyes mentioned in her 1986 Lead thread, we didn't speak up even when we knew deep down we were right. This is why, even now, so many of us struggle with guilt for not being good enough, for being kicked out, for leaving even when we knew it was right. THIS is why, even now, so many people go to great leaps of logic to justify the behavior of TWI leadership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SOME of us were abused in this manner..... in the 90's it was most of us. THIS is why, like Eyes mentioned in her 1986 Lead thread, we didn't speak up even when we knew deep down we were right. This is why, even now, so many of us struggle with guilt for not being good enough, for being kicked out, for leaving even when we knew it was right. THIS is why, even now, so many people go to great leaps of logic to justify the behavior of TWI leadership.[/color]

And this is why some of us after being kicked out of the Corps or TWI went on to abusive relationships. Because it is where we felt comfortable and where we thought we belonged.

As usual Belle you have provided us with a comprehensive bit of information to chew on, Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Belle thank you! I read eyes posts. This explains a lot to me. I was never part of the way but there was an person who tried to recurite me into TWI after I lost a loved one and some of the tactics were used on me. But I never fell for it. :eusa_clap::eusa_clap::eusa_clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Belle

Do anyone of you remember PFAL 77 what vic did to the camera

person. That was whole sale big time step in controlling everone there.

From then own he set up the steps to be marked as the MOG.

And if you messed up you whole life would be flushed in front of thousands.

Not that the person even messed up.

I think vp planned the whole thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Men may disagree with this, but women actually got a double whammy because we were to submit in everything. To this day (after 7 yrs) I still find myself acquiescing to something my husband wants me to do just because he wants me to. As of the last 2 mos. I have been very focused on looking at things as an individual person and recognizing when I am doing something because I let myself get pushed into something deep down I felt was not right. No matter how minor. And just mindlessly do it just because I was told to. To recognize I am an adult and don’t need someone to tell me what to do or how to do it. This is harder to do than it sounds.

On the other hand, men got much more blame. They were held responsible for everything that went on under their roof, whether it was reasonable or could be helped or not.

No boundaries in twi. You couldn’t EVER say no. There was no place where they stopped and you began. They didn’t stop and you never began.

This to me is the most important part of recovery. Much more important than the doctrinal issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would expect to have a fulfilling, exciting life living with a servant?!?! Not me, that's for sure. My wife is independent, outspoken and has different opinions on many subjects. And, yes, that leads to some pretty heated discussions, BUT, she is her own person. And she expects me to be my own person. We respect each others' individuality, and in fact, that's in large part what keeps the "spark" alive. TWI's practices and teachings repressed that spark of life...the individual's uniqueness!!

That individual uniqueness is what makes us so very precious to God. What I can't do for Him, someone else can. The person I can't help, someone else can. That's the Body. That's the Church. Each of us has traits and abilities that can interact with others to make God's love living and real. But, with all that uniqueness, the one common bond that unites us is that love, God's love. Why wouldn't I want that same kind of relationship in a marriage? Why wouldn't I yearn for that to be the way my brothers and sisters in Christ live?

vp never got that part right. He never saw the real beauty of accepting people for who they were in Christ and helping them grow. And I think that was because he never accepted Jesus Christ as the Head of the Body of Christ. His version of the love of God was to enforce conformity and obedience. He tried to control us into walking for God...like little robots. He could never let go of the reins and allow Christ to direct his people. He really blew his ministry because of this. It shouldn't surprise anyone that he would demand the same practices of married couples, should it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great post Belle-

Not only did I get abused for asking questions, I got the "face melt".

They had a total meltdown if you questioned anything leadership did. It was a crock of bs. Total intimidation to make us submit to their dumb decisions to do whatever they wanted to.

Danny-I was at Pifl 77. I agree that was a set up. If it wouldn't have been that camera man he would have picked on someone else. What an ego. He used to do that with the corps all the time. Just trying to establish his mog domination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt the cameraman knew it was coming, waysider, just that VPW did. He got his kicks showing us how "tapped in" he was, how hard working he was, and how spiritual detail-oriented he was.

Now 'scuse me while I hurl...

Eyesopen, you said

And this is why some of us after being kicked out of the Corps or TWI went on to abusive relationships. Because it is where we felt comfortable and where we thought we belonged.
Rather, we didn't know red flags when we saw them. I for one never felt I belonged with an abuser, nor was I ever comfortable there. But my ability to be taken advantage of more than once points to a tremendous ability to overlook my gut feelings.

Wierwille wanted to blame us women for that, too. If we stayed with an abuser, we had a spirit of masochism.

Talk about dam*ed if ya do, and dam*ed if ya don't!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's face it-

vpw set out, from the beginning, to be obyed without question, and to never have disagreements.

That's why he dissolved the Board of Directors and set up a trio that he could control.

That's why he put forth he was the sole Christian in 2000 years to hear the voice of God and

teach God's Word like it hadn't been known in that time-while taking all his teachings from

material already in existence.

That's why the corps was set up to FOLLOW ORDERS WITHOUT QUESTION NO MATTER WHAT.

(We're still hearing horror stories about that.)

That's why he was "The Teacher"- even long before he ever taught a pfal/rthst class.

That's why "the suggestion of a general is tantamount to a command."

etc. etc.

vpw wanted people who were-in terms of judgement and free will- HELPLESS.

That way, he could tell them what to believe and what to do-

and they'd believe it and do it.

Was he successful?

There's still people believing everything he said and he's been dead for 20 years.

How's that for a successful salesman and conman?

To work on staff was to be subject to his rants when he felt like ranting-without warning,

without pattern and without good cause,

and to be paid less than minimum wage AND not contribute to a Social Security fund,

thus ensuring you would NEED to "work until you die."

(That's only been corrected for the last year or two.)

To be a corps grad was to follow any orders that came down,

to work on your own, send in 10% of your salary,

to take 2 weeks off work, travel on your own money to hq,

then spend 2 weeks of manual labour setting up and putting on the ROA-

or earn vpw's wrath for having a life.

To be a corps student was to spend 4 years paying tuition, live in a walk-in closet,

eat disgusting food I've never HEARD of because it's cheap,

perform manual labour while paying for the privilege,

and risk life and limb hitchhiking to sell pfal

or climb mountains under unsafe directions and unsafe instructors.

How many people do you know came out of the way corps looking malnourished

and wearing cast-off clothing and second-hand suits?

For which they paid tuition for....

To be a wow was to pay them for the privilege of going wow,

be sent somewhere with no say on the location,

travel on your own expense (carpooling with wows in cars),

work fulltime and sell pfal,

run pfal classes on your own time and at your own expense,

then return at the end at your own expense,

having brought in pfal class tuitions and new people expected to pay 10%

of their salaries,

for which you received a lapel pin.

To be none of the above was to be told what to do by those who WERE

in the above categories (except wows), and to be told to give 10% of your

income and believe whatever vpw said-

and encourage others to do the same.

All levels of involvement in twi were constructed to benefit vpw,

accomplish his goals, and to do whatever he said and soak up whatever punishment

he sought to dish out.

And those closest to him were hardly immune to this-

cg admitted in pop that he (cg) and ha put up with a lot of abuse

from vpw.

A read-thru of "vp and me" shows lcm put up with abuse from vpw when they

were in contact.

God only knows what Mrs W lived through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This information really hit home for me because - I know this is going to be hard to believe - I'm typically a very strong, outspoken person with a tendency to be stubborn. It's not typical of me to be taken advantage of or to allow others to control me - especially not every aspect of my life.

It bothers me, still, that I just gave them control lock, stock & barrel over my life. I got to the point where I was pretty much helpless in every area of my life. I mean in stupid simple things. I'd list examples, but it's just too darn embarrassing. I couldn't make a decision if my life depended on it.

What gets me is that some of the folks knew what was going on - had to know the culture was emotionally, psychologically and spiritually unhealthy and did NOTHING to stop it. Dottie Moynihan has a degree in psychology, no? She counseled women who were raped - knew that was going on and did NOTHING. She had to have recognized the dynamics of the organization. *shaking my head*

The control of information - not allowing us to think for ourselves.... no wonder we eventually got to where we couldn't think for ourselves. Remembering the letters sent to people at HQ that contained Chris Jordan's study on debt - IF TWI were a healthy environment they would have welcomed the discussion, debate and differing viewpoints - the recipients wouldn't have been scared to even read the letters - the leadership wouldn't have gone to great lengths to track down the source of this contraband information.

I find it very unlikely that anyone left in TWI has a healthy mental state of being. Some are obviously more scarred than others, but nobody is completely unharmed from this kind of abuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Emotional abuse victims can become so convinced that they are worthless that they believe that no one else could want them. They stay in abusive situations because they believe they have nowhere else to go. Their ultimate fear is being all alone.
The only thing I would add to this:

They sometimes also stay in relationships that they PERCEIVE as being abusive. Whether the abuse is there or not, the effect is the same, and that in itself isn't exactly healthy.

I think a lot of the problem is the belief system itself, that if you made an agreement, you have to keep it right or wrong. That was certainly drummed into us, "If thou vowest a vow.." you stay with it until you're dead if need be. I think deliberate abuse of any kind invalidates the agreement.

Types of Emotional Abuse

Abusive Expectations

* The other person places unreasonable demands on you and wants you to put everything else aside to tend to their needs.

* It could be a demand for constant attention, or a requirement that you spend all your free time with the person.

* But no matter how much you give, it's never enough.

The troubling part of this is so much of it is cultural, generations of learned behavior. Some people think it is "normal". It is a trap, and I've seen some people literally wear themselves out emotionally and physically trying to keep up with the pace. I think that a lot of people were not consciously aware of the demands, and now find it increasingly difficult to maintain them, along with the increasing demands of society and work. Something has to give somewhere..
* You are subjected to constant criticism, and you are constantly berated because you don't fulfill all this person's needs.
I think this is clearly where it crosses the line.
Aggressing

* Aggressive forms of abuse include name-calling, accusing, blaming, threatening, and ordering. Aggressing behaviors are generally direct and obvious. The one-up position the abuser assumes by attempting to judge or invalidate the recipient undermines the equality and autonomy that are essential to healthy adult relationships. This parent-child pattern of communication (which is common to all forms of verbal abuse) is most obvious when the abuser takes an aggressive stance.

* Aggressive abuse can also take a more indirect form and may even be disguised and "helping." Criticizing, advising, offering solutions, analyzing, proving, and questioning another person may be a sincere attempt to help. In some instanceshowever, these behaviors may be an attempt to belittle, control, or demean rather than help. The underlying judgmental "I know best" tone the abuser takes in these situations is inappropriate and creates unequal footing in peer relationships. This and other types of emotional abuse can lead to what is known as learned helplessness.

I think this is perhaps the most damaging form of abuse, where a person forms an association between abuse and "niceness".

They've learned not to reach out to a hand offering real help.

Denying

* Denying a person's emotional needs, especially when they feel that need the most, and done with the intent of hurting, punishing or humiliating (Examples)

In psychological terms, this is an element of operant conditioning.
* The other person may deny that certain events occurred or that certain things were said. confronts the abuser about an incident of name calling, the abuser may insist, "I never said that," "I don't know what you're talking about," etc. You know differently.
This was the mark of "leadership". They wouldn't admit it even if you had their tit in a vise..
* The other person may deny your perceptions, memory and very sanity.
"You are being influenced by da DEBIL.."
* Withholding is another form of denying. Withholding includes refusing to listen, refusing to communicate, and emotionally withdrawing as punishment. This is sometimes called the "silent treatment."

Same use of operant conditioning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...