washington: The deadline for interrogatories could be as far away as a year or two as in the Peeler case, or this winter, depending on how many motions I file and TWI files. I am thinking that TWI's attorneys will be up here for ski season next winter at the earliest..
I am allowed 25 written interrogatories under federal rules, so let your imagination go wild with what question would be the most damaging or embarrassing fact that could be revealed publically about TWI.......
Pat, please ask about the true relationship between Donna and Rosalie and why Donna gets to remain at hq. Is it just a good friendship, or something much deeper? Even if it were a friendship, why the royal treatment?
As you know, this is quite important to lots of us cause of past TWI policy, that demands the spouse of disgraced or terminated Corps be sent away with the disgraced or terminated Corps.
I would reccomend finding out in some way about what types of files they keep on people. I don't know if you were Corps, but it seems that they kept a lot of paperwork specifically on Corps, although I know there is some on regular people too. It would be interesting to see.
If you are minister and therefore exempt from Federal income tax, do you still have to file? If so, past tax record have been VERY revealing in many cases.
Not sure how you could work it into a case about a web site but you asked for creative.
quote:If you are minister and therefore exempt from Federal income tax,
just a clarification...
We heavy revvies are only exempt from that part of our incomes that constitutes housing expense... otherwise we pay income tax just like real people (well, poor people).
It's a piddling little suit over a domain name. You can fantasize all you want about turning up some "damaging or embarrassing fact" but discovery will be limited to questions relevant to the subject matter of the suit.
I think one has to understand that pat is not suing twi but that twi is going after pat. That makes a difference to me...it tells me he has to fight or lose quite a bit.
wouldn't these questions have to pertain to the spacifics of the suit?
I wouldn't think you could ask for answers to anything not concerning the site thats for sale.
my question would be, why did you wait so long to file this suit and why didn't you take the advice you were given a long time ago and register it then? ok, thats 2 questions lol
My comments in this thread specifically relate to this thread, in which you have represented to people that you will be able to ask TWI virtually anything you want and that they will have to answer your questions under oath. That is simply not true. If you ask them questions about matters not relevant to the subject matter of the suit, they will object to the questions, based on rule 26 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Practice.
long gone: You are correct and I know this. But that doesn't mean that they can't be asked anyway or saved for another lawsuit....
I asked a question in an interrogatory that I sent to the plaintff in a case. Because we were not limited to 25 interrogatories including subsections as with Federal Rules of Discovery, I went ahead with the extra question knowing I hadn't wasted part of the limit.
I asked something to the effect of:is there any other information you haven't disclosed that we should know about that is important for us to know?
Surprisingly, they answered and gave me information that I didn't know about. You don't ask, you don't have a chance of getting......
Recommended Posts
washingtonweather
I will be thinking!
I really will!...
Is there a deadline?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pjroberge
washington: The deadline for interrogatories could be as far away as a year or two as in the Peeler case, or this winter, depending on how many motions I file and TWI files. I am thinking that TWI's attorneys will be up here for ski season next winter at the earliest..
I am allowed 25 written interrogatories under federal rules, so let your imagination go wild with what question would be the most damaging or embarrassing fact that could be revealed publically about TWI.......
Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldiesman
Pat, please ask about the true relationship between Donna and Rosalie and why Donna gets to remain at hq. Is it just a good friendship, or something much deeper? Even if it were a friendship, why the royal treatment?
As you know, this is quite important to lots of us cause of past TWI policy, that demands the spouse of disgraced or terminated Corps be sent away with the disgraced or terminated Corps.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zshot
How about...
Are they / did they pay roylaties to authors whose works were plagerizied?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mister P-Mosh
I would reccomend finding out in some way about what types of files they keep on people. I don't know if you were Corps, but it seems that they kept a lot of paperwork specifically on Corps, although I know there is some on regular people too. It would be interesting to see.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
templelady
I want copies of the files they have on me and CW the ones from Alaska. THe files submitted to the prosecution, senators etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
My3Cents
3 words, Pat:
FOLLOW THE MONEY
Link to comment
Share on other sites
vickles
yes, I agree, I want to know if they keep all those files and where are they now? If they have mine I want the destroyed!!!!!!!!!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JustThinking
If you are minister and therefore exempt from Federal income tax, do you still have to file? If so, past tax record have been VERY revealing in many cases.
Not sure how you could work it into a case about a web site but you asked for creative.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Plotinus
JT.
you say,
just a clarification...
We heavy revvies are only exempt from that part of our incomes that constitutes housing expense... otherwise we pay income tax just like real people (well, poor people).
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OnionEater
Ask if LCM is still receiving any pay from TWI.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shellon
Given twi passion for lying under oath, as well as anywhere, I can't understand the point of asking questions.
They are gonna answer them like they've always answered them; to their favor.
And us? Left with a bag of unanswered questions, as usual.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pjroberge
Shellon:
You ask the questions of TWI under oath, and should they lie(purjury), they can be charged with a criminal offense.
And with enough hard court admissible evidence and documentation, you can may be able to prove any perjury that may have occurred.
You have no chance of catching them however if you don't ask the questions...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LG
More wild fantasy and self aggrandizement.
It's a piddling little suit over a domain name. You can fantasize all you want about turning up some "damaging or embarrassing fact" but discovery will be limited to questions relevant to the subject matter of the suit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pjroberge
Long Gone:
Apparently you really don't inderstand or read what has been posted.
Your last post does not appear to be a contest entry, nor is your claim of self aggrandizement based on any factual basis.
Also, the lawsuit is about alleged copyright infringement with a small part being the domain name.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
vickles
I think one has to understand that pat is not suing twi but that twi is going after pat. That makes a difference to me...it tells me he has to fight or lose quite a bit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shellon
Pat said: You ask the questions of TWI under oath, and should they lie(purjury), they can be charged with a criminal offense.
============================================
I totally understand how the legal process works, thanks.
Yes, they will lie,(purjury) and SHOULD be charged with a criminal offense.
For me personally, I just can't stomach the same old lies to the same old questions.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
papajohn
wouldn't these questions have to pertain to the spacifics of the suit?
I wouldn't think you could ask for answers to anything not concerning the site thats for sale.
my question would be, why did you wait so long to file this suit and why didn't you take the advice you were given a long time ago and register it then? ok, thats 2 questions lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LG
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pjroberge
Long Gone:
This thread is about the lawsuit contest, not the lawsuit.
You have posted your criticisms of me on the lawsuit thread and now you come to this thread to post the same criticisms. Why is that?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LG
Pat,
My comments in this thread specifically relate to this thread, in which you have represented to people that you will be able to ask TWI virtually anything you want and that they will have to answer your questions under oath. That is simply not true. If you ask them questions about matters not relevant to the subject matter of the suit, they will object to the questions, based on rule 26 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Practice.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pjroberge
long gone: You are correct and I know this. But that doesn't mean that they can't be asked anyway or saved for another lawsuit....
I asked a question in an interrogatory that I sent to the plaintff in a case. Because we were not limited to 25 interrogatories including subsections as with Federal Rules of Discovery, I went ahead with the extra question knowing I hadn't wasted part of the limit.
I asked something to the effect of:is there any other information you haven't disclosed that we should know about that is important for us to know?
Surprisingly, they answered and gave me information that I didn't know about. You don't ask, you don't have a chance of getting......
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frank123lol
Ask em why they spend Gods money on stupid trials.They sure ....ed alot of my hard earned cash away on stupid sh%%t
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheInvisibleDan
What's their secret recipe behind producing so many idiots?
nah, scratch that...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.